Posts
Looking for deaths per 100k, the highest death rates are in Peru & Eastern Europe.
...followed second by the U.S. and S. America.
...followed third by Western Europe, Russia, Iran and South Africa.
...and. followed notably least by China, almost the entirety of Africa, India, Australia, Indonesia, and Venezuela is an outlier in S. America.
Interesting that Africa's death rates are comparatively low, whereas African Americans are particularly susceptible.
What accounts for the areas having the lowest and highest death rates?
Race, diet, climate, distribution of vaccines, quality of healthcare, having some prior exposure / immunity, or relations with China?
Diet would seem to be the primary factor for susceptibility.
Maps & Stats
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-51235105
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1104709/coronavirus-deaths-worldwide-per-million-inhabitants/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_death_rates_by_country
https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2020/health/coronavirus-maps-and-cases/
Other questions
1. If covid is a man-made, biological weapon:
a) Who does covid target? i.e. who are the targets of the Chinese government? Was it created for eugenic purposes to affect people in China? Or specifically the U.S. to leverage the vulnerability of the American diet? Or is it that western diets are more susceptible, particularly in the U.S., which makes sense that unhealthy people are more vulnerable to illness.
b) Is there a human-devised mutation strategy unfolding and if so, is it coordinated to coincide with events, such as elections, political and economic power movements. If so, can we observe the coincidence with future events?
Clearly, the mutations that are occurring are being tracked and the trajectory anticipated, some predictions leaving open the possibility of it getting weaker, and some warning that it will get stronger.
More certainly, we will observe future events coinciding with the viral activity as the circumstances are taken advantage of and reacted to by various entities.
The original COVID was actually rolled out during SARs in 2009, followed by original-strength covid as we know it in 2019, then weakened delta and now far weakest but most transmissible omicron. Will the new variants be more transmissible AND stronger?
The first of articles below states most clearly that 'we don't know' about the future of covid. No shit. Notable that European articles tend to predict things getting worse and call for tightening of restrictions:
https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/22586816/next-coronavirus-variant-delta-covid-19
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-03619-8
https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/5-things-to-know-delta-variant-covid
2. Vaccines:
Trump claims responsibility for producing the vaccines, yet there is much distrust and conspiracy from what would seem to be all / opposing sides, including his own supporters with the idea that the vaccines are being mandated by the Left for political control, that the vaccines are being used for microchipping perhaps to serve an authoritarian power, and that WHO and Bill Gates are profiting from the vaccines.
Again, here we have the U.S. military testing a new kind of vaccine - effective against all variants - on the way. Will it be effective against future variants?
African Americans are also often reluctant to take vaccines, and BLM specifically opposes vaccine mandates. So, the idea of BLM being a global tool of the Left and part of leftist totalitarianism doesn't align on this particular point.
Further, big pharma such as Pfizer sponsoring mainstream news seems an interesting pairing, just as big tech and corporations have sponsored BLM - again, counter to Trump's having produced vaccines - yet, we don't know the breakdown of these vaccine origins relative to political alliances - WHO and Bill Gates - and how those relationships reconcile, cross over, etc. And, where do countries like Russia and China fit into all of this?
The more I observe, the more I conclude that various entities will certainly react to chaotic circumstances to capitalize and serve their own agendas, and that the likelihood of successfully executing an overall, well-coordinated plan is less plausible. Not that they aren't trying, just that there's a lot of inconsistency worth noting.
To be continued...
