Showing posts with label tech. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tech. Show all posts

Sunday, December 31, 2017

Seattle tech sex trafficking

https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/crime/online-site-where-men-rated-prostitutes-is-shut-down-charges-to-be-filed/http://www.newsweek.com/metoo-microsoft-amazon-trafficking-prostitution-sex-silicon-valley-755611https://www.engadget.com/2017/12/25/amazon-microsoft-employees-sex-trafficking-sting/http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-42120800
from the article excerpts posted on slashdot.org:Newsweek's National Politics Correspondent reports on "a horny nest of prostitution 'hobbyists' at tech giants Microsoft, Amazon and other firms in Seattle," citing "hundreds" of emails "fired off by employees at major tech companies hoping to hook up with trafficked Asian women" between 2014 and 2016, "67 sent from Microsoft, 63 sent from Amazon email accounts and dozens more sent from some of Seattle's premier tech companies and others based elsewhere but with offices in Seattle, including T-Mobile and Oracle, as well as many local, smaller tech firms." Many of the emails came from a sting operation against online prostitution review boards, and were obtained through a public records request to the King County Prosecutor's Office.

"They were on their work accounts because Seattle pimps routinely asked first-time sex-buyers to prove they were not cops by sending an employee email or badge," reports Newsweek, criticizing "the widespread and often nonchalant attitude toward buying sex from trafficked women, a process made shockingly more efficient by internet technology... A study commissioned by the Department of Justice found that Seattle has the fastest-growing sex industry in the United States, more than doubling in size between 2005 and 2012. That boom correlates neatly with the boom of the tech sector there... Some of these men spent $30,000 to $50,000 a year, according to authorities." A lawyer for some of the men argues that Seattle's tech giants aren't conducting any training to increase employees' compassion for trafficked women in brothels. The director of research for a national anti-trafficking group cites the time Uber analyzed ride-sharing data and reported a correlation between high-crime neighborhoods and frequent Uber trips -- including people paying for prostitutes. "They made a map using their ride-share data, like it was a funny thing they could do with their data. It was done so flippantly."

Thursday, December 14, 2017

California cell phone warning

http://www.fresnobee.com/news/local/article189586129.html

About 95 percent of Americans own a cell phone, and 12 percent rely on their smartphones for everyday Internet access, the health department said. In addition, the average age when children get their first phone is now just 10, and a majority of young people keep their phones on or near them most of the day and while they sleep. “Children’s brains develop through the teenage years and may be more affected by cellphone use,” Smith said. “Parents should consider reducing the time their children use cellphones and encourage them to turn the devices off at night.”
Other tips for reducing exposure to radio frequency energy from cellphones: Keeping the phone away from the body, reducing cellphone use when the signal is weak, reducing the use of cellphones to stream audio or video or to download or upload large files, keeping the phone away from the bed at night, removing headsets when not on a call, and avoiding products that claim to block radio frequency energy because they may actually increase your exposure.

Saturday, December 10, 2016

Bose Hearphones: earbud noise filtering

http://hearphones.bose.com/

App description

http://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2016/12/9/13900420/bose-hear-earbuds-hearphones-augment-sound-app

Bose made earbuds that act like hearing aids

A hearing aide, if you will

Friday, December 9, 2016

Thursday, August 25, 2016

World's first self-driving taxis debut in Singapore


World's first self-driving taxis debut in Singapore

SINGAPORE (AP) — The world's first self-driving taxis will be picking up passengers in Singapore starting Thursday.
Select members of the public will be able to hail a free ride through their smartphones in taxis operated by nuTonomy, an autonomous vehicle software startup. While multiple companies, including Google and Volvo, have been testing self-driving cars on public roads for several years, nuTonomy says it will be the first to offer rides to the public. It will beat ride-hailing service Uber, which plans to offer rides in autonomous cars in Pittsburgh, by a few weeks.
The service will start small — six cars now, growing to a dozen by the end of the year. The ultimate goal, say nuTonomy officials, is to have a fully self-driving taxi fleet in Singapore by 2018, which will help sharply cut the number of cars on Singapore's congested roads. Eventually, the model could be adopted in cities around the world, nuTonomy says.
For now, the taxis only will run in a 2.5-square-mile business and residential district called "one-north," and pick-ups and drop-offs will be limited to specified locations. And riders must have an invitation from nuTonomy to use the service. The company says dozens have signed up for the launch, and it plans to expand that list to thousands of people within a few months.
The cars — modified Renault Zoe and Mitsubishi i-MiEV electrics — have a driver in front who is prepared to take back the wheel and a researcher in back who watches the car's computers. Each car is fitted with six sets of Lidar — a detection system that uses lasers to operate like radar — including one that constantly spins on the roof. There are also two cameras on the dashboard to scan for obstacles and detect changes in traffic lights.
The testing time-frame is open-ended, said nuTonomy CEO Karl Iagnemma. Eventually, riders may start paying for the service, and more pick-up and drop-off points will be added. NuTonomy also is working on testing similar taxi services in other Asian cities as well as in the U.S. and Europe, but he wouldn't say when.
"I don't expect there to be a time where we say, 'We've learned enough,'" Iagnemma said.
Doug Parker, nuTonomy's chief operating officer, said autonomous taxis could ultimately reduce the number of cars on Singapore's roads from 900,000 to 300,000.
"When you are able to take that many cars off the road, it creates a lot of possibilities. You can create smaller roads, you can create much smaller car parks," Parker said. "I think it will change how people interact with the city going forward."
NuTonomy, a 50-person company with offices in Massachusetts and Singapore, was formed in 2013 by Iagnemma and Emilio Frazzoli, Massachusetts Institute of Technology researchers who were studying robotics and developing autonomous vehicles for the Defense Department. Earlier this year, the company was the first to win approval from Singapore's government to test self-driving cars in one-north. NuTonomy announced a research partnership with Singapore's Land Transport Authority earlier this month.
Singapore is ideal because it has good weather, great infrastructure and drivers who tend to obey traffic rules, Iagnemma says. As a land-locked island, Singapore is looking for non-traditional ways to grow its economy, so it's been supportive of autonomous vehicle research.
Auto supplier Delphi Corp., which is also working on autonomous vehicle software, was recently selected to test autonomous vehicles on the island and plans to start next year.
"We face constraints in land and manpower. We want to take advantage of self-driving technology to overcome such constraints, and in particular to introduce new mobility concepts which could bring about transformational improvements to public transport in Singapore," said Pang Kin Keong, Singapore's Permanent Secretary for Transport and the chairman of its committee on autonomous driving.
Olivia Seow, 25, who does work in startup partnerships in one-north and is one of the riders nuTonomy selected, took a test ride of just less than a mile on Monday. She acknowledged she was nervous when she got into the car, and then surprised as she watched the steering wheel turn by itself.
"It felt like there was a ghost or something," she said.
But she quickly grew more comfortable. The ride was smooth and controlled, she said, and she was relieved to see that the car recognized even small obstacles like birds and motorcycles parked in the distance.
"I couldn't see them with my human eye, but the car could, so I knew that I could trust the car," she said. She said she is excited because the technology could free up her time during commutes or help her father by driving him around as he grows older.
An Associated Press reporter taking a ride Wednesday observed that the safety driver had to step on the brakes once, when a car was obstructing the test car's lane and another vehicle, which appeared to be parked, suddenly began moving in the oncoming lane.
Iagnemma said the company is confident that its software can make good decisions. The company hopes its leadership in autonomous driving will eventually lead to partnerships with automakers, tech companies, logistics companies and others.
"What we're finding is the number of interested parties is really overwhelming," he said.
___
Durbin reported from Detroit.

Domino's delivery drone

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11700291

Aerial pizza delivery may sound futuristic but Domino's has been given the green light to test New Zealand pizza delivery via drones.
The fast food chain has partnered with drone business Flirtey to launch the first commercial drone delivery service in the world, starting later this year.
Domino's Group chief executive and managing director, Don Meij said the company had been investigating innovative and new delivery methods as business had grown.
This included looking at robotic delivery, which the government is still considering.
Details around where the trial would be held have been kept under wraps - however Domino's said it would use drone delivery alongside its usual delivery methods - and only where it would be faster than the use of a car or scooter.
It will offer drone delivery specials at the launch of the trial with plans to extend the dimensions, weight and distance of the deliveries throughout the trial, based on results and customer feedback.
The company will not offer the full range of its products for drone delivery - and only those customers within a certain distance from a store will be served from the air.
"With the increased number of deliveries we make each year, we were faced with the challenge of ensuring our delivery times continue to decrease and that we strive to offer our customers new and progressive ways of ordering from us," Meij said.
"Research into different delivery methods led us to Flirtey. Their success within the airborne delivery space has been impressive and it's something we have wanted to offer our customers," he said.

Sunday, May 22, 2016

Motorola RAZR returns June 2016 - correction: NOT returning

Update - reps confirmed, no return:

http://christiantimes.com/article/motorola-razr-will-not-be-revived-after-all/56266.htm

Motorola Razr news 2016: Will not be revived after all

Talks about Motorola bringing back the clamshell phone or flip phone this year have been making rounds on the web. However, a most recent report negates the speculation.
video released by Motorola Mobility may have suggested that Motorola Razr flip phone might be revived. The clip showed several young people who may have been students in a high school halls setting using and talking on the flip phone. The description of the clip stated, "Flip back to the Razr days of yesteryear and get ready for the future."
According to TechPortal, the original Motorola Razr hit the market in 2004 and then sold over 130 million handsets in the following four years. Aside from the stylish and appealing look on the outside, Motorola Razr also featured qualities and highlighted aspects that turned the model into a success especially among the youth. This was practically the essence showcased in the Motorola Mobility teaser video.
In the event a Motorola Razr 2016 version launches, it may still carry its flagship flip and slender design. Looking back on the Razr clamshell phone may prove to be pleasing, nice and nostalgic but this may well remain a throwback in memory and will not be the actual case.
In Time's most recent report, it debunked all the previous speculations about the Motorola Razr comeback. It wrote with assurance that there are no plans for the brand to release a 2016 version of the extensively well-received handset from more than a decade ago.
The article quoted Motorola representative Kathryn Hanley explaining that the brand appreciates how the throwback video was generally welcomed with excitement as Razr was an iconic phone which demonstrated that a mobile phone could function excellently and at the same time be stylish. Hanley went on to clear the air saying, "While Moto is not re-releasing the RAZR, we will transform mobile again on June 9."
The date refers to the upcoming Lenovo Tech World event in San Francisco where Motorola is slated to introduce new products and announce other news.
Lenovo acquired Motorola Mobility from Google in 2014.
--
http://www.engadget.com/2016/05/20/moto-razr-flip-phone-teaser/


The year was 2004, and Motorola had just announced what was then an insanely thin flip phone, the RAZR V3. It was -- and still is -- a head-turner, and eventually over 130 million units were sold in total. Such were the glorious days of Motorola. Twelve years later, the now Lenovo-owned brand appears to be prepping a relaunch of this legendary model, according to its teaser video of a nostalgic walkthrough at a high school. "Flip back to the Razr days of yesteryear and get ready for the future." Well, our money's on an Android refresh of the RAZR flip phone, and we're already quite stoked about that. The big unveil will take place at Lenovo Tech World on June 9th, and we have a feeling that this new RAZR may overshadow the new Moto X devices that are also expected there.

Tuesday, April 19, 2016

3D printed shoes - Under Armour

http://www.solidsmack.com/cad-design-news/worlds-first-3d-printed-training-shoe-is-coming-from-under-armour/

We’ve seen 3D printed shoes as far back as 2012. Adidas has innovated with ocean waste, and some even adapt to your foot. Now, Under Armour has created the world’s first commercially available 3D printed training shoes.


Under Armour teamed up with Autodesk to create these innovative shoes in an effort to make training shoes both lightweight and supportive. The result is the UA Architech, training shoes that promise to be comfortable, durable, and supportive.

To make sure the new shoes hit all the right marks, Under Armour had to use a new structure for the midsole. The final design uses a lattice structure – an idea they got from a computer program rather than an athletic expert. During the design stages, the company consulted an algorithmic systems to create structures based on the desired criteria, a process known as generative design. When it was time to actually build the shoes, the task proved to be too difficult for existing manufacturing methods. In comes Autodesk with their software Autodesk Within used to create the new stable heel.

architech-3d-printed-shoe-under-armour-05
“Traditional manufacturing processes like injection molding typically don’t work well for the complex structures that come out of a generative design,” said Senior Director of Design, Mark Davis. “3D printing does give more flexibility to produce shoes that benefit from the lattice—in this case it provides greater stability and cushioning than conventional designs.”

But the 3D printing technology doesn’t just stop at the midsole. These elements are also found in the heel and the upper area of the shoe where the “Clutchfit Auxetic” design is meant to adapt to the shape and movement of the wearer for a more precise fit. These new features are an addition to Under Armour’s trademark “Charged Foam” cushioning for comfort and responsiveness and a thin rubber outsole for traction. All of these elements combined, result in Under Armour’s ultimate performance trainer.

Under Armour is not the only company to implement 3D printing technology in their shoes. Last year, New Balance created the first 3D printed running shoe. Before that Adidas revealed its own 3D printed midsole molded for an athlete’s foot. But the thing that makes the UA Architech different is it’ll be available commercially as a limited edition starting March 18 via Under Armour’s website. The shoes costs $299.99 and 96 pairs – a reference to the company being founded in 1996 – will be available for the masses.

“One of the real benefits of 3D printing is that it will allow for an era of mass customization,” Davis said. “Meaning that every individual consumer could have a custom designed shoe just for them, based on their height, weight, athletic needs.”

Combining 3D printing with wearables has been successful in the past, so hopefully these new shoes will prove to be a hit. (They’re already “sold out” on the website. A good sign?) With the promise of being lightweight, supportive, and comfortable the UA Architech promises to be the ultimate trainers for all athletes.
architech-3d-printed-shoe-under-armour-01
architech-3d-printed-shoe-under-armour-02
architech-3d-printed-shoe-under-armour-04

Monday, January 5, 2015

Smart Home: Missing OS

http://kernelmag.dailydot.com/issue-sections/features-issue-sections/11294/the-missing-piece-of-the-smart-home-revolution/


Fortunately, it appears the bit-by-bit building of smart home operating systems could help sidestep this issue. “This is not one size fits all,” explained Hawkinson. “It’s up to your preferences. There’s no way to automate when kids go to bed.”
Photo by F Delventhal/Flickr (CC 2.0) | Remix by Max Fleishman
- See more at: http://kernelmag.dailydot.com/issue-sections/features-issue-sections/11294/the-missing-piece-of-the-smart-home-revolution/#sthash.7rFXDUkr.dpuf
The Internet isn’t going anywhere—it’s going everywhere.
Despite the oft-mocked naming scheme, the Internet of Things (IoT) has an incredibly practical goal: connecting classically “dumb” objects—toasters, doorknobs, light switches—to the Internet, thereby unlocking a world of potential. Imagine what it means to interact with your home the same way you would a website, accessing it without geographic restrictions to lock and unlock your doors, adjust the thermostat, or even identify where people are in your house.
This of course has huge implications for consumers and businesses alike. Entrepreneurs are already cashing in on what will inevitably become a mainstay of the modern home—automated sensory technology that enables you talk to and customize your living space in new and intriguing ways. The Internet of Things, when it delivers to the fullest, finds ways to make you even more comfortable in the space you already call home.
Imagine what it means to interact with your home the same way you would a website.
As these technologies sense and and react to changes in your environment, there are obvious parallels to computer operating systems, which receive input and return output. What does the “operating system” for the smart home of the future look like?
Think about it this way: When the smartphone revolution began, the underlying platform that made the phone smart, that enabled apps, was the operating system (iOS and Android, primarily). So what will be the system that capitalizes on the smart home in the same way, the enabler of all the applications and actions we want our homes to run and do?
Alex Hawkinson is trying to help answer that very question. The founder and CEO of IoT company SmartThings is not only a leader in the market, he’s a consumer. (Hawkinson is so bursting with Minnesota hometown pride that he’s rigged his kitchen lights to flash purple whenever the Vikings score a touchdown.)
He suggests there won’t be a singular, cohesive operating system for your home, that this stuff isn’t one-size-fits-all. “I think it’s up to everyone to determine their own bits,” Hawkinson said. “Some people love cameras in house, my wife wants none. It’s up to your preferences.”
What does the “operating system” for the smart home of the future look like?
SmartThings offers a variety of products to build your own intelligent home system from the ground up. The company has Internet-capable security solutions, locks that talk to your phone, and even light bulbs that can receive Internet data and behave in unique ways. They all come from the same company, but that doesn’t mean SmartThings wants to be the one-stop mainframe for your house.
That equal opportunity mindset isn’t how all IoT companies are attacking the market. Loxone, for example, wants to become the cohesive home management system, something straight out of our sci-fi movie future. The company has seen ample success in Europe since its 2008 founding, but it has yet to make the same waves in the U.S. Its primary commercial offering is the Loxone Miniserver, which marries hardware and software in such a way that it becomes a chameleon of home automation, able to function as multiple home devices at once. The Miniserver consists of electronic relays, and the software controlling them can effectively imitate the electronics of various household objects while talking to the Internet.
“If it needs to be a climate controller, we have software that makes those relays perform accordingly,” said CEO Chris Raab. “We completely dispense with the notion of a thermostat. Ours is intelligence-based, and gets its data from sensors in the environment. It considers things like humidity and CO2, and based on that info, it does the decision-making. Most other systems are without logic. This really separates us from other systems. It’s not another remote control; it truly is an intelligent system.”
The contemporary consumer will build their smart home one solution at a time because we don’t yet think that there’s a home automation “problem.”
A company called Arrayent is taking a third, middle-of-the-road approach. Its clients aren’t people looking to build the smart home of their dreams, but instead the companies that manufacture home appliances and gadgets for them. The company isn’t consumer-facing, but its technology is powering devices that consumers will buy.
“We work with a customer that knows all about garage door openers, for example,” Bob Dahlberg, Arrayent’s vice president of business development, explained. “It’s a company called Chamberlain that has some 70 percent of the market share. We are experts in Internet technology, they are experts in garage door openers, so we work with them to install Wi-Fi modules in their devices. This means that even if you’re 10 miles out from home and can’t remember if you shut the garage door or not, it’s easy to check.”
Like Hawkinson, Dahlberg is skeptical that a single OS is going to meet everyone’s IoT needs in the way that iOS and Android have dominated smartphones. The contemporary consumer will build their smart home one solution at a time—a smart lightbulb here, a presence-detector there—because we don’t yet think that there’s a home automation “problem.”
“There won’t be a Microsoft or Intel of IoT,” he said. “There are a lot of applications and moving parts in these things. If you talk to the guys at Whirlpool, and we have, not one of them will tell you that they have a 100 percent Whirlpool-equipped home even though they work there and have ready access to it.”
“We completely dispense with the notion of a thermostat.” —Loxone CEO Chris Raab
The real potential for home automation, Dahlberg says, lies not in local software running on a home device but in the cloud. “In order to get all these things working together, it’s not going to be a hub or Swiss Army Knife of protocols. The cloud is going to be more important over time. By getting your brand into the cloud now, your opportunities magnify.”
The most salient point here is that consumers have yet to identify home automation as a problem. Right now, it’s a feature. Consider Nest, which simply set out to build a better thermostat. It decided to do one thing well, and it did it so well that Google bought the company last year for $3.2 billion. Nest has since released an intelligent CO2 detector, called Nest Protect. The company approached the Internet of Things space the same way that Dahlberg says consumers are: by building a piecemeal system to meet their needs, one unit at a time.
So, yes, right now the Internet of Things is rather disjointed. At least, it is when compared to how we’re traditionally approached Internet and computers systems. Microsoft and Apple dominated desktop and laptop systems; Apple and Android did the same for mobile (of course, with solid competition from market outliers). But while this has brought immediate stability and understanding to those technologies, it’s also created a walled garden—iOS-only apps here, continuity communication issues there—that hurt end-users.
Fortunately, it appears the bit-by-bit building of smart home operating systems could help sidestep this issue. “This is not one size fits all,” explained Hawkinson. “It’s up to your preferences. There’s no way to automate when kids go to bed.”
Photo by F Delventhal/Flickr (CC 2.0) | Remix by Max Fleishman
- See more at: http://kernelmag.dailydot.com/issue-sections/features-issue-sections/11294/the-missing-piece-of-the-smart-home-revolution/#sthash.7rFXDUkr.dpuf

The missing piece of the smart home revolution

By Dylan Love on January 4th, 2015
The Internet isn’t going anywhere—it’s going everywhere.
Despite the oft-mocked naming scheme, the Internet of Things (IoT) has an incredibly practical goal: connecting classically “dumb” objects—toasters, doorknobs, light switches—to the Internet, thereby unlocking a world of potential. Imagine what it means to interact with your home the same way you would a website, accessing it without geographic restrictions to lock and unlock your doors, adjust the thermostat, or even identify where people are in your house.
This of course has huge implications for consumers and businesses alike. Entrepreneurs are already cashing in on what will inevitably become a mainstay of the modern home—automated sensory technology that enables you talk to and customize your living space in new and intriguing ways. The Internet of Things, when it delivers to the fullest, finds ways to make you even more comfortable in the space you already call home.
Imagine what it means to interact with your home the same way you would a website.
As these technologies sense and and react to changes in your environment, there are obvious parallels to computer operating systems, which receive input and return output. What does the “operating system” for the smart home of the future look like?
Think about it this way: When the smartphone revolution began, the underlying platform that made the phone smart, that enabled apps, was the operating system (iOS and Android, primarily). So what will be the system that capitalizes on the smart home in the same way, the enabler of all the applications and actions we want our homes to run and do?
Alex Hawkinson is trying to help answer that very question. The founder and CEO of IoT company SmartThings is not only a leader in the market, he’s a consumer. (Hawkinson is so bursting with Minnesota hometown pride that he’s rigged his kitchen lights to flash purple whenever the Vikings score a touchdown.)
He suggests there won’t be a singular, cohesive operating system for your home, that this stuff isn’t one-size-fits-all. “I think it’s up to everyone to determine their own bits,” Hawkinson said. “Some people love cameras in house, my wife wants none. It’s up to your preferences.”
What does the “operating system” for the smart home of the future look like?
SmartThings offers a variety of products to build your own intelligent home system from the ground up. The company has Internet-capable security solutions, locks that talk to your phone, and even light bulbs that can receive Internet data and behave in unique ways. They all come from the same company, but that doesn’t mean SmartThings wants to be the one-stop mainframe for your house.
That equal opportunity mindset isn’t how all IoT companies are attacking the market. Loxone, for example, wants to become the cohesive home management system, something straight out of our sci-fi movie future. The company has seen ample success in Europe since its 2008 founding, but it has yet to make the same waves in the U.S. Its primary commercial offering is the Loxone Miniserver, which marries hardware and software in such a way that it becomes a chameleon of home automation, able to function as multiple home devices at once. The Miniserver consists of electronic relays, and the software controlling them can effectively imitate the electronics of various household objects while talking to the Internet.
“If it needs to be a climate controller, we have software that makes those relays perform accordingly,” said CEO Chris Raab. “We completely dispense with the notion of a thermostat. Ours is intelligence-based, and gets its data from sensors in the environment. It considers things like humidity and CO2, and based on that info, it does the decision-making. Most other systems are without logic. This really separates us from other systems. It’s not another remote control; it truly is an intelligent system.”
The contemporary consumer will build their smart home one solution at a time because we don’t yet think that there’s a home automation “problem.”
A company called Arrayent is taking a third, middle-of-the-road approach. Its clients aren’t people looking to build the smart home of their dreams, but instead the companies that manufacture home appliances and gadgets for them. The company isn’t consumer-facing, but its technology is powering devices that consumers will buy.
“We work with a customer that knows all about garage door openers, for example,” Bob Dahlberg, Arrayent’s vice president of business development, explained. “It’s a company called Chamberlain that has some 70 percent of the market share. We are experts in Internet technology, they are experts in garage door openers, so we work with them to install Wi-Fi modules in their devices. This means that even if you’re 10 miles out from home and can’t remember if you shut the garage door or not, it’s easy to check.”
Like Hawkinson, Dahlberg is skeptical that a single OS is going to meet everyone’s IoT needs in the way that iOS and Android have dominated smartphones. The contemporary consumer will build their smart home one solution at a time—a smart lightbulb here, a presence-detector there—because we don’t yet think that there’s a home automation “problem.”
“There won’t be a Microsoft or Intel of IoT,” he said. “There are a lot of applications and moving parts in these things. If you talk to the guys at Whirlpool, and we have, not one of them will tell you that they have a 100 percent Whirlpool-equipped home even though they work there and have ready access to it.”
“We completely dispense with the notion of a thermostat.” —Loxone CEO Chris Raab
The real potential for home automation, Dahlberg says, lies not in local software running on a home device but in the cloud. “In order to get all these things working together, it’s not going to be a hub or Swiss Army Knife of protocols. The cloud is going to be more important over time. By getting your brand into the cloud now, your opportunities magnify.”
The most salient point here is that consumers have yet to identify home automation as a problem. Right now, it’s a feature. Consider Nest, which simply set out to build a better thermostat. It decided to do one thing well, and it did it so well that Google bought the company last year for $3.2 billion. Nest has since released an intelligent CO2 detector, called Nest Protect. The company approached the Internet of Things space the same way that Dahlberg says consumers are: by building a piecemeal system to meet their needs, one unit at a time.
So, yes, right now the Internet of Things is rather disjointed. At least, it is when compared to how we’re traditionally approached Internet and computers systems. Microsoft and Apple dominated desktop and laptop systems; Apple and Android did the same for mobile (of course, with solid competition from market outliers). But while this has brought immediate stability and understanding to those technologies, it’s also created a walled garden—iOS-only apps here, continuity communication issues there—that hurt end-users.
Fortunately, it appears the bit-by-bit building of smart home operating systems could help sidestep this issue. “This is not one size fits all,” explained Hawkinson. “It’s up to your preferences. There’s no way to automate when kids go to bed.”
Photo by F Delventhal/Flickr (CC 2.0) | Remix by Max Fleishman
- See more at: http://kernelmag.dailydot.com/issue-sections/features-issue-sections/11294/the-missing-piece-of-the-smart-home-revolution/#sthash.7rFXDUkr.dpuf

The missing piece of the smart home revolution

By Dylan Love on January 4th, 2015
The Internet isn’t going anywhere—it’s going everywhere.
Despite the oft-mocked naming scheme, the Internet of Things (IoT) has an incredibly practical goal: connecting classically “dumb” objects—toasters, doorknobs, light switches—to the Internet, thereby unlocking a world of potential. Imagine what it means to interact with your home the same way you would a website, accessing it without geographic restrictions to lock and unlock your doors, adjust the thermostat, or even identify where people are in your house.
This of course has huge implications for consumers and businesses alike. Entrepreneurs are already cashing in on what will inevitably become a mainstay of the modern home—automated sensory technology that enables you talk to and customize your living space in new and intriguing ways. The Internet of Things, when it delivers to the fullest, finds ways to make you even more comfortable in the space you already call home.
Imagine what it means to interact with your home the same way you would a website.
As these technologies sense and and react to changes in your environment, there are obvious parallels to computer operating systems, which receive input and return output. What does the “operating system” for the smart home of the future look like?
Think about it this way: When the smartphone revolution began, the underlying platform that made the phone smart, that enabled apps, was the operating system (iOS and Android, primarily). So what will be the system that capitalizes on the smart home in the same way, the enabler of all the applications and actions we want our homes to run and do?
Alex Hawkinson is trying to help answer that very question. The founder and CEO of IoT company SmartThings is not only a leader in the market, he’s a consumer. (Hawkinson is so bursting with Minnesota hometown pride that he’s rigged his kitchen lights to flash purple whenever the Vikings score a touchdown.)
He suggests there won’t be a singular, cohesive operating system for your home, that this stuff isn’t one-size-fits-all. “I think it’s up to everyone to determine their own bits,” Hawkinson said. “Some people love cameras in house, my wife wants none. It’s up to your preferences.”
What does the “operating system” for the smart home of the future look like?
SmartThings offers a variety of products to build your own intelligent home system from the ground up. The company has Internet-capable security solutions, locks that talk to your phone, and even light bulbs that can receive Internet data and behave in unique ways. They all come from the same company, but that doesn’t mean SmartThings wants to be the one-stop mainframe for your house.
That equal opportunity mindset isn’t how all IoT companies are attacking the market. Loxone, for example, wants to become the cohesive home management system, something straight out of our sci-fi movie future. The company has seen ample success in Europe since its 2008 founding, but it has yet to make the same waves in the U.S. Its primary commercial offering is the Loxone Miniserver, which marries hardware and software in such a way that it becomes a chameleon of home automation, able to function as multiple home devices at once. The Miniserver consists of electronic relays, and the software controlling them can effectively imitate the electronics of various household objects while talking to the Internet.
“If it needs to be a climate controller, we have software that makes those relays perform accordingly,” said CEO Chris Raab. “We completely dispense with the notion of a thermostat. Ours is intelligence-based, and gets its data from sensors in the environment. It considers things like humidity and CO2, and based on that info, it does the decision-making. Most other systems are without logic. This really separates us from other systems. It’s not another remote control; it truly is an intelligent system.”
The contemporary consumer will build their smart home one solution at a time because we don’t yet think that there’s a home automation “problem.”
A company called Arrayent is taking a third, middle-of-the-road approach. Its clients aren’t people looking to build the smart home of their dreams, but instead the companies that manufacture home appliances and gadgets for them. The company isn’t consumer-facing, but its technology is powering devices that consumers will buy.
“We work with a customer that knows all about garage door openers, for example,” Bob Dahlberg, Arrayent’s vice president of business development, explained. “It’s a company called Chamberlain that has some 70 percent of the market share. We are experts in Internet technology, they are experts in garage door openers, so we work with them to install Wi-Fi modules in their devices. This means that even if you’re 10 miles out from home and can’t remember if you shut the garage door or not, it’s easy to check.”
Like Hawkinson, Dahlberg is skeptical that a single OS is going to meet everyone’s IoT needs in the way that iOS and Android have dominated smartphones. The contemporary consumer will build their smart home one solution at a time—a smart lightbulb here, a presence-detector there—because we don’t yet think that there’s a home automation “problem.”
“There won’t be a Microsoft or Intel of IoT,” he said. “There are a lot of applications and moving parts in these things. If you talk to the guys at Whirlpool, and we have, not one of them will tell you that they have a 100 percent Whirlpool-equipped home even though they work there and have ready access to it.”
“We completely dispense with the notion of a thermostat.” —Loxone CEO Chris Raab
The real potential for home automation, Dahlberg says, lies not in local software running on a home device but in the cloud. “In order to get all these things working together, it’s not going to be a hub or Swiss Army Knife of protocols. The cloud is going to be more important over time. By getting your brand into the cloud now, your opportunities magnify.”
The most salient point here is that consumers have yet to identify home automation as a problem. Right now, it’s a feature. Consider Nest, which simply set out to build a better thermostat. It decided to do one thing well, and it did it so well that Google bought the company last year for $3.2 billion. Nest has since released an intelligent CO2 detector, called Nest Protect. The company approached the Internet of Things space the same way that Dahlberg says consumers are: by building a piecemeal system to meet their needs, one unit at a time.
So, yes, right now the Internet of Things is rather disjointed. At least, it is when compared to how we’re traditionally approached Internet and computers systems. Microsoft and Apple dominated desktop and laptop systems; Apple and Android did the same for mobile (of course, with solid competition from market outliers). But while this has brought immediate stability and understanding to those technologies, it’s also created a walled garden—iOS-only apps here, continuity communication issues there—that hurt end-users.
Fortunately, it appears the bit-by-bit building of smart home operating systems could help sidestep this issue. “This is not one size fits all,” explained Hawkinson. “It’s up to your preferences. There’s no way to automate when kids go to bed.”
Photo by F Delventhal/Flickr (CC 2.0) | Remix by Max Fleishman
- See more at: http://kernelmag.dailydot.com/issue-sections/features-issue-sections/11294/the-missing-piece-of-the-smart-home-revolution/#sthash.7rFXDUkr.dpuf

The missing piece of the smart home revolution

By Dylan Love on January 4th, 2015
The Internet isn’t going anywhere—it’s going everywhere.
Despite the oft-mocked naming scheme, the Internet of Things (IoT) has an incredibly practical goal: connecting classically “dumb” objects—toasters, doorknobs, light switches—to the Internet, thereby unlocking a world of potential. Imagine what it means to interact with your home the same way you would a website, accessing it without geographic restrictions to lock and unlock your doors, adjust the thermostat, or even identify where people are in your house.
This of course has huge implications for consumers and businesses alike. Entrepreneurs are already cashing in on what will inevitably become a mainstay of the modern home—automated sensory technology that enables you talk to and customize your living space in new and intriguing ways. The Internet of Things, when it delivers to the fullest, finds ways to make you even more comfortable in the space you already call home.
Imagine what it means to interact with your home the same way you would a website.
As these technologies sense and and react to changes in your environment, there are obvious parallels to computer operating systems, which receive input and return output. What does the “operating system” for the smart home of the future look like?
Think about it this way: When the smartphone revolution began, the underlying platform that made the phone smart, that enabled apps, was the operating system (iOS and Android, primarily). So what will be the system that capitalizes on the smart home in the same way, the enabler of all the applications and actions we want our homes to run and do?
Alex Hawkinson is trying to help answer that very question. The founder and CEO of IoT company SmartThings is not only a leader in the market, he’s a consumer. (Hawkinson is so bursting with Minnesota hometown pride that he’s rigged his kitchen lights to flash purple whenever the Vikings score a touchdown.)
He suggests there won’t be a singular, cohesive operating system for your home, that this stuff isn’t one-size-fits-all. “I think it’s up to everyone to determine their own bits,” Hawkinson said. “Some people love cameras in house, my wife wants none. It’s up to your preferences.”
What does the “operating system” for the smart home of the future look like?
SmartThings offers a variety of products to build your own intelligent home system from the ground up. The company has Internet-capable security solutions, locks that talk to your phone, and even light bulbs that can receive Internet data and behave in unique ways. They all come from the same company, but that doesn’t mean SmartThings wants to be the one-stop mainframe for your house.
That equal opportunity mindset isn’t how all IoT companies are attacking the market. Loxone, for example, wants to become the cohesive home management system, something straight out of our sci-fi movie future. The company has seen ample success in Europe since its 2008 founding, but it has yet to make the same waves in the U.S. Its primary commercial offering is the Loxone Miniserver, which marries hardware and software in such a way that it becomes a chameleon of home automation, able to function as multiple home devices at once. The Miniserver consists of electronic relays, and the software controlling them can effectively imitate the electronics of various household objects while talking to the Internet.
“If it needs to be a climate controller, we have software that makes those relays perform accordingly,” said CEO Chris Raab. “We completely dispense with the notion of a thermostat. Ours is intelligence-based, and gets its data from sensors in the environment. It considers things like humidity and CO2, and based on that info, it does the decision-making. Most other systems are without logic. This really separates us from other systems. It’s not another remote control; it truly is an intelligent system.”
The contemporary consumer will build their smart home one solution at a time because we don’t yet think that there’s a home automation “problem.”
A company called Arrayent is taking a third, middle-of-the-road approach. Its clients aren’t people looking to build the smart home of their dreams, but instead the companies that manufacture home appliances and gadgets for them. The company isn’t consumer-facing, but its technology is powering devices that consumers will buy.
“We work with a customer that knows all about garage door openers, for example,” Bob Dahlberg, Arrayent’s vice president of business development, explained. “It’s a company called Chamberlain that has some 70 percent of the market share. We are experts in Internet technology, they are experts in garage door openers, so we work with them to install Wi-Fi modules in their devices. This means that even if you’re 10 miles out from home and can’t remember if you shut the garage door or not, it’s easy to check.”
Like Hawkinson, Dahlberg is skeptical that a single OS is going to meet everyone’s IoT needs in the way that iOS and Android have dominated smartphones. The contemporary consumer will build their smart home one solution at a time—a smart lightbulb here, a presence-detector there—because we don’t yet think that there’s a home automation “problem.”
“There won’t be a Microsoft or Intel of IoT,” he said. “There are a lot of applications and moving parts in these things. If you talk to the guys at Whirlpool, and we have, not one of them will tell you that they have a 100 percent Whirlpool-equipped home even though they work there and have ready access to it.”
“We completely dispense with the notion of a thermostat.” —Loxone CEO Chris Raab
The real potential for home automation, Dahlberg says, lies not in local software running on a home device but in the cloud. “In order to get all these things working together, it’s not going to be a hub or Swiss Army Knife of protocols. The cloud is going to be more important over time. By getting your brand into the cloud now, your opportunities magnify.”
The most salient point here is that consumers have yet to identify home automation as a problem. Right now, it’s a feature. Consider Nest, which simply set out to build a better thermostat. It decided to do one thing well, and it did it so well that Google bought the company last year for $3.2 billion. Nest has since released an intelligent CO2 detector, called Nest Protect. The company approached the Internet of Things space the same way that Dahlberg says consumers are: by building a piecemeal system to meet their needs, one unit at a time.
So, yes, right now the Internet of Things is rather disjointed. At least, it is when compared to how we’re traditionally approached Internet and computers systems. Microsoft and Apple dominated desktop and laptop systems; Apple and Android did the same for mobile (of course, with solid competition from market outliers). But while this has brought immediate stability and understanding to those technologies, it’s also created a walled garden—iOS-only apps here, continuity communication issues there—that hurt end-users.
Fortunately, it appears the bit-by-bit building of smart home operating systems could help sidestep this issue. “This is not one size fits all,” explained Hawkinson. “It’s up to your preferences. There’s no way to automate when kids go to bed.”
Photo by F Delventhal/Flickr (CC 2.0) | Remix by Max Fleishman
- See more at: http://kernelmag.dailydot.com/issue-sections/features-issue-sections/11294/the-missing-piece-of-the-smart-home-revolution/#sthash.7rFXDUkr.dpuf