Thursday, November 29, 2018

China in Panama

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/nov/28/panama-china-us-latin-america-canal

Panama the new flashpoint in China's growing presence in Latin America

A spat over the site of China’s embassy has underlined the strategic value of the canal – through which two-thirds of ships to or from the US pass
Jutting four kilometres into the Pacific, the Amador causeway islands separate the concrete and glass skyline of Panama City from the soaring iron arch of the Bridge of the Americas.
 Jutting four kilometres into the Pacific, the Amador causeway islands separate the concrete and glass skyline of Panama City from the entrance to the Panama Canal. Photograph: Danielho/Getty Images/iStockphoto
Jutting four kilometres into the Pacific, the Amador causeway islands separate the concrete and glass skyline of Panama City from the soaring iron arch of the Bridge of the Americas – under which 40 cargo ships pass each day en route to or from the Panama Canal.
Linked to the mainland by a slender causeway, these strategic outcrops are home to a handful of derelict buildings once used to house US military personnel.
But they have become a new flashpoint in the global rivalry between Beijing and Washington, as the US struggles to develop a coherent strategy to deal with China’s rising influence in Latin America.
China’s plans to build a new embassy on the islands were derailed after US officials pressured the government of Panama’s president, Juan Carlos Varela, to withdraw its offer of a four-hectare plot, according to senior Panamanian and diplomatic sources.
“Of course there was pushback from the US: they weren’t going to allow a huge Chinese flag next to the entrance to the canal,” a diplomatic source told the Guardian. “But local pressure was also important. Handing over that land to the Chinese would have been a hugely unpopular move by the Varela government.”
Panama’s government has insisted that the decision was based on security and environmental concerns.
But a previous plan to build a new Chinese embassy in the traditional diplomatic district of Panama City was also blocked by objections from Washington, and Beijing has now established a temporary mission in an office block.
The incident may prove to be a pyrrhic victory for Washington, however. This weekend, the Chinese premier, Xi Jinping, arrives in Panama for a visit aimed at cementing ties with the Central American nation.
It will be the first such visit by a senior Chinese figure since Panama cut diplomatic ties with Taiwan to open formal relations with Beijing in June 2017.
Since then, the two countries have signed 28 diplomatic and investment agreements, a $500m renminbi-denominated “Panda” bond is expected before the end of the year and Chinese contractors have won major contracts for a port, convention centre and a new bridge over the canal.
The growth of Chinese investment and influence in the country has been the source of growing unease in Washington.
Panama’s President Juan Carlos Varela, left, and the US secretary of state Mike Pompeo talk on a balcony after a meeting at the Palacio de las Garzas in October 2018.
Pinterest
 President Juan Carlos Varela, left, and the US secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, talk at the presidential palace in Panama City. Photograph: Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images
In July, the US secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, ended a visit to Panama with the warning that “when China comes calling, it’s not always to the good of your citizens”. He added that state-run Chinese firms often operated with political, rather than market-driven, motives.
Xi’s visit comes amid an escalating trade war between China and the US, which has highlighted Panama’s strategic importance as a pinch-point of world commerce.
Two-thirds of ships to or from the US pass through the Panama Canal – which was an unincorporated territory of the US between 1903 and 1979 and was home to dozens of American military installations.
“Recent rhetoric from Washington suggests the US has not accepted that the canal has shifted from being a military asset to a commercial one,” said Eddie Tapiero, a competitive intelligence specialist for the Panama Canal Authority and author of a new book on China-Panama relations. “The US has a decision to make: does it accept free trade in the Americas or does it revert to a cold war approach? The latter would be disastrous.”
Negotiations for a free trade agreement between China and Panama are at an advanced stage; Panamanian officials say the country can benefit from its growing role as a regional logistics hub, build its exports to China and protect local farmers.
“We will become the gateway for Chinese goods into Latin America,” the trade minister, Augusto Arosemena, told the Guardian. “I think Panama will be an example of how smaller countries can negotiate with China.”
Meanwhile, the US has been caught flatfooted: diplomats were unaware of Varela’s decision to establish ties with Beijing until hours before its announcement and the state department has yet to name a replacement for John Feeley, who stood down as ambassador in March saying he was “honor bound” to resign rather than serve under Donald Trump.
Wei Qiang, the Chinese ambassador to Panama, has dismissed the “apprehensive, fearful and jealous speculations” over his country’s intentions. “China’s world vision is one of dialogue and accommodation rather than confrontation, we have no option but to let the facts speak for themselves,” he said at a recent book launch.
But in recent years, Beijing has shown growing interest in strategic infrastructure projects in the region: Chinese companies are involved in a project to build a rival interoceanic canal through Nicaragua and investigated the option of a “dry canal” railroad linking Colombia’s Atlantic and Pacific coasts.
Some Panamanians are also wary of Bejing’s intentions, said Euclides Tapia, a professor of international relations at the University of Panama. “The Chinese are here for the long term – and they’ve come for the canal,” he said.

Tuesday, November 27, 2018

colostrum - diet notes - email to Symco

Why did you purchase your Sovereign Laboratories product? (Also, if you don't mind sharing your age, that would really help us out.)

Hi, I turned 47 in October.

Cognitive enhancement, joint repair, gut health, athletic and sexual performance, etc. Not ready for stem cell therapy, avoid the risks of HGH and test. replacement, go colostrum to boost my own. Let's see what happens, I'm in 5 weeks or so, I read that it takes 8 weeks to see effects. I'd love to cut cost because I'm taking a lot!

I originally learned about colostrum searching on Dr. Eric Berg's youtube channel for 'inflammation'. He has one video that talks about colostrum, saying it causes the body to produce more HGH.

I had a previous conversation with a very fit man in his 70s, I had asked if he had done testosterone replacement, and he had not, but said he'd consider HGH, although he said there is a risk of growing existing cancer cells.

Since June, I've lost 20 lbs, completely changed my diet and have been experimenting with various supplements. Daily kale and spinach now, fruit.

 I wasn't sure if my testosterone was low or if I had low thyroid (previous report), but I wanted to optimize my energy levels, my sexual health, reduce my BMI to take pressure off of my joints, and establish a sustainable diet that would control my blood sugar so I don't go up and down with carb cravings in order to stay in good health and weight as I get older. I also have been very interested in gut health since around 2013 - I've always had stomach issues and found interesting the relationship to seratonin, so I began experimenting with probiotics at that time and previously cleaned up my sugar habits and diet, lost weight, but later began lifting heavier and getting bigger again (muscular), and allowing the sugar in at times. In part, I was eating more carbs because the low calorie diet made me tired, and I felt better energy, but then the sugar came in again and that's probably what screwed me up.

I've always exercised, I've never been obese, I'm muscular and always have lifted. This last year I was bigger than before, muscular, but I felt lethargic and was getting a bloated stomach from too much sugar after a rough year and a break up. I decided to lose weight and size, and get lean, but again, really I was worried about energy levels which has been an issue over the last several years, impacting lethargy and sexual performance.

June, I carb-cycled (weekends only, protein/veg. during the week) and lost 10-15 lbs. July - mid. Sept. I did keto to try to sub fat for carbs. Mid-Sept.-Oct, I added carbs a few times per week because keto wasn't enough energy. Nov. I'm carb cycling without any fat to lean out and I added heavy colostrum - 2 tbsp 2-3x/day.

My testosterone is in the middle, so not a problem, and I am borderline at risk of hypothyroidism, but not low. My goal was to optimize my health, lose weight, lower my body fat and BMI, and I consulted an endocrinologist and G.I. doctor. I'm 6', my weight went from 250 to 230 within a couple of months, and my body fat is now around 21%, and my testosterone went up by about 70 points. All of this progress occurred BEFORE using colostrum, my results were in October.

I began taking colostrum probably 5 weeks ago. Again, originally searching for 'inflammation', then learning about the other benefits, particularly the promise of healing the gut, being the core of the immune system, and the higher dosages promising anabolic effects for performance - of course, I'm interesting in the athletic enhancement, but in particular the suggestion that more HGH will repair and reverse aging is most compelling. I just bought some for my mom who just turned 75 this month, interested to see how if affects her - she has gut issues as well, her sister had leaky gut.



Monday, November 19, 2018

GitLab all remote

GitLab's Secret To Success? All Its 350 Employees Work Remotely (inc.com)19

Inc. magazine explains a unique feature of GitLab. "Every employee of the San Francisco-based startup, which offers tools for software developers, works from home."Three years ago, that was nine people. Today, GitLab's 350 employees across 45 countries use video calls and Slack chats to stay constantly connected.... GitLab meetings and presentations are uploaded to YouTube. Its employee handbook -- over 1,000 pages long when printed -- is publicly available online as a resource, so employees can get questions answered without waking up co-workers in a different time zone.

The biggest advantage to an all-remote team is obvious: Your hiring pool is gigantic, and you don't need to convince top talent to move for you. GitLab's percentage of quality job applications is similar to other companies -- its dramatic number of recent hires is due to how many applications it receives, 13,000 in the second quarter of 2018 alone. On the other hand, maintaining a culture is really difficult. "To be honest, I was definitely a bit concerned," says Dave Munichiello, a general partner at Alphabet's venture capital arm, GV, which invested in GitLab in 2017. "What happens when the all-hands meeting isn't a bunch of folks hanging around the water cooler listening to the CEO articulate the vision and the mission?"

GitLab's leaders constantly think about it. Co-founder and CEO Sid Sijbrandij even hired away Netflix's vice president of talent, Barbie Brewer, to serve as chief people officer. Virtual coffee breaks, where employees talk about their lives outside GitLab, are built into everyone's schedules. Senior leaders hold office hours in video chat rooms that anyone can join. When GitLab meets its monthly goals, everyone gets a free dinner. "What we've learned from GitLab," Munichiello says, "is that when you have a leadership team that's as committed to remote-only as they are, and as communicative and transparent as they are, and as insistent on documentation as they are, it can work."